Cooper v Jonathan McCloskey [2011] NIIT 359_10IT (12 January 2011)

Cooper v Jonathan McCloskey [2011] NIIT 359_10IT (12 January 2011)

The claim was dismissed because the claimant failed to attend three scheduled hearings, demonstrating no interest in pursuing the claim, justifying dismissal under Rule 27(5).

Citation
[2011] NIIT 359_10IT
Parties
Claimant: Kerry Cooper; Respondent: Jonathan McCloskey
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
12 January 2011
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal / Dismissal for Non Attendance
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Breach of Contract, Holiday Pay, Particulars of Contract, Itemised Pay Statement, Non Attendance, Dismissal of Claim
Employment Law Breach of Contract Holiday Pay Particulars of Contract Itemised Pay Statement Non Attendance Dismissal of Claim

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kerry Cooper

Claimant

Jonathan McCloskey

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Industrial Tribunal / Dismissal for Non Attendance

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claim should be dismissed due to the claimant's repeated failure to attend hearings

Ratio Decidendi

The claim was dismissed because the claimant failed to attend three scheduled hearings, demonstrating no interest in pursuing the claim, justifying dismissal under Rule 27(5).

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed

Orders

  • The claim is dismissed under rule 27(5) of the Industrial Tribunals Rules of Procedure due to the claimant’s failure to attend the hearing.