JR141, Re Application for Judicial Review [2021] NIQB 57 (25 May 2021)
The SSHD's requests for information under Article 34 were lawful, relevant, and non-excessive, made for the permitted purpose of examining the application for international protection. The data was processed lawfully and fairly. No breach of Regulation 604/2013, Data Protection Act 2018, GDPR, SSHD policy, section 55 Borders, Citizenship and Immigration Act 2009, or Article 8 ECHR was established. The applicant has not established an arguable case with a reasonable prospect of success.
- Citation
- [2021] NIQB 57
- Parties
- Applicant: JR141; Proposed Respondent: Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 25 May 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Leave to Apply for Judicial Review
- Outcome
- Leave for judicial review refused
- Legal Topics
- Asylum, Age Assessment, EU Regulation 604/2013, Data Processing, Children's Welfare, Article 8 ECHR
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
JR141
Applicant
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Proposed Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Leave to Apply for Judicial Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Lawfulness of SSHD's request for information under Article 34 of Regulation (EU) 604/2013
- 2 Lawfulness of retention and use of personal data
- 3 Compliance with Data Protection Act 2018 and GDPR
Ratio Decidendi
The SSHD's requests for information under Article 34 were lawful, relevant, and non-excessive, made for the permitted purpose of examining the application for international protection. The data was processed lawfully and fairly. No breach of Regulation 604/2013, Data Protection Act 2018, GDPR, SSHD policy, section 55 Borders, Citizenship and Immigration Act 2009, or Article 8 ECHR was established. The applicant has not established an arguable case with a reasonable prospect of success.
Court Disposition
Leave for judicial review refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment