Wilson v Karen Kenny Superintendent Chris Yates Police Service of Northern Ire... [2012] NIIT 00729_12IT (31 January 0 2012)
The claimant withdrew her application to include a claim of Disability Discrimination; therefore, the application was dismissed and the first and second respondents were dismissed from the proceedings, leaving only the unauthorised deduction from wages claim against the third respondent.
- Citation
- [2012] NIIT 00729_12IT
- Parties
- Claimant: Rosemary Wilson; Respondent: Karen Kenny; Respondent: Superintendent Chris Yates; Respondent: Police Service of Northern Ireland
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Industrial Tribunal / Pre Hearing Review
- Outcome
- Application to include Disability Discrimination claim dismissed; first and second respondents dismissed from proceedings; claim for unauthorised deduction from wages to proceed against third respondent.
- Legal Topics
- Disability Discrimination, Unauthorised Deduction From Wages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rosemary Wilson
Claimant
Karen Kenny
Respondent
Superintendent Chris Yates
Respondent
Police Service of Northern Ireland
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal / Pre Hearing Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant may include a claim of Disability Discrimination
- 2 Whether the first and second respondents should remain parties to the proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant withdrew her application to include a claim of Disability Discrimination; therefore, the application was dismissed and the first and second respondents were dismissed from the proceedings, leaving only the unauthorised deduction from wages claim against the third respondent.
Court Disposition
Application to include Disability Discrimination claim dismissed; first and second respondents dismissed from proceedings; claim for unauthorised deduction from wages to proceed against third respondent.
Orders
- Proceedings to continue against the third respondent only
- First and second respondents dismissed from proceedings
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment