Harkley v KMR Windows Ltd and KMR Window... [2009] NIIT 5136_09IT (27 October 2009)
The claimant was dismissed due to the respondent's financial difficulties and cessation of trading. The tribunal found the claims for redundancy pay, unpaid wages, holiday pay, and notice pay to be well founded based on the evidence provided by the claimant.
- Citation
- [2009] NIIT 5136_09IT
- Parties
- Claimant: Mark Harkley; Respondent: KMR Windows Ltd; Respondent: KMR Windows
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 27 October 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Industrial Tribunal / Final Decision
- Outcome
- Claims for redundancy pay, unpaid wages, holiday pay, and notice pay upheld against KMR Windows Ltd. KMR Windows dismissed from proceedings.
- Legal Topics
- Redundancy Pay, Unpaid Wages, Holiday Pay, Notice Pay, Dismissal, Employer Insolvency
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mark Harkley
Claimant
KMR Windows Ltd
Respondent
KMR Windows
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to redundancy pay
- 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to unpaid wages
- 3 Whether the claimant is entitled to holiday pay
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant was dismissed due to the respondent's financial difficulties and cessation of trading. The tribunal found the claims for redundancy pay, unpaid wages, holiday pay, and notice pay to be well founded based on the evidence provided by the claimant.
Court Disposition
Claims for redundancy pay, unpaid wages, holiday pay, and notice pay upheld against KMR Windows Ltd. KMR Windows dismissed from proceedings.
Orders
- KMR Windows Ltd to pay £1,960 to the claimant for redundancy pay.
- KMR Windows Ltd to pay £225 to the claimant for unpaid wages.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment