Simpson v KPL Contracts Ltd (In Administ... [2015] NIIT 00798_15IT (20 August 2015)
The claimant was within the scope of the protective award, the employer failed to pay remuneration due under the award, and although the claim was not brought within the primary time-limit, it was not reasonably practicable to do so until the protective award was made. The claim was brought within a further period the tribunal considered reasonable, given the reasons for delay and absence of prejudice to the respondent or Department.
- Citation
- [2015] NIIT 00798_15IT
- Parties
- Claimant: Keith Simpson; Respondent: KPL Contracts Ltd (In Administration)
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 20 August 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal Claim / Merits Hearing and Decision on Liability Under Article 220 of the Employment Rights (northern Ireland) Order 1996
- Outcome
- Claim under Article 220 of the Employment Rights (Northern Ireland) Order 1996 is well-founded.
- Legal Topics
- Protective Award, Redundancy, Collective Consultation, Time Limits, Employment Rights (northern Ireland) Order 1996
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Keith Simpson
Claimant
KPL Contracts Ltd (In Administration)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal Claim / Merits Hearing and Decision on Liability Under Article 220 of the Employment Rights (northern Ireland) Order 1996
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was within the scope of the relevant protective award
- 2 Whether the employer failed to pay remuneration pursuant to the protective award
- 3 Whether the Article 220 claim was made within the statutory time-limit
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant was within the scope of the protective award, the employer failed to pay remuneration due under the award, and although the claim was not brought within the primary time-limit, it was not reasonably practicable to do so until the protective award was made. The claim was brought within a further period the tribunal considered reasonable, given the reasons for delay and absence of prejudice to the respondent or Department.
Court Disposition
Claim under Article 220 of the Employment Rights (Northern Ireland) Order 1996 is well-founded.
Orders
- The amount due to the claimant will be determined at a further hearing if necessary.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment