Redfern v KPMG & Anor [2006] NIIT 365_05 (5 July 2006)
The claim was not presented within the statutory time-limit and is therefore dismissed.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2006] NIIT 365_05
- Parties
- Claimant: Adam Redfern; Respondent: KPMG; Respondent: Shop Electric Limited (In Liquidation)
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 05 July 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Industrial Tribunal / Pre Hearing Review
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Time Limits for Claims, Dismissal of Claim
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Adam Redfern
Claimant
KPMG
Respondent
Shop Electric Limited (In Liquidation)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal / Pre Hearing Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claim was presented within the statutory time-limit under Article 217(5) of the Employment Rights (Northern Ireland) Order 1996
Ratio Decidendi
The claim was not presented within the statutory time-limit and is therefore dismissed.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- Claim dismissed due to being out of time
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [ DONATE ] Industrial Tribunals Northern Ireland Decisions You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Industrial Tribunals Northern Ireland Decisions >> Redfern v KPMG & Anor [2006] NIIT 365_05 (5 July 2006) URL: https://www.bailii.org/nie/cases/NIIT/2006/365_05.html Cite as: [2006] NIIT 365_5, [2006] NIIT 365_05 [ New search ] [ Printable RTF version ] [ Help ] THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALS CASE REF: 365/05 CLAIMANT: Adam Redfern RESPONDENTS: 1. KPMG 2. Shop Electric Limited (In Liquidation) DECISION ON A PRE-HEARING REVIEW The decision of the tribunal is that the claim has not been presented within the time-limit set out in Article 217(5) of the Employment Rights (Northern Ireland) Order 1996, and the claim is dismissed. Constitution of Tribunal: Chairman: Mr P. Buggy (sitting alone) Appearances: The claimant was not present or represented. The respondent was represented by Mr P Martin of Arthur Cox, Solicitors. REASONS The reasons for this decision were given orally at the conclusion of the hearing. The claimant was duly notified of the date of this hearing. He was not in attendance and was not represented at the hearing. In the circumstances, I decided to dispose of the proceedings in the absence of the claimant. Prior to doing so, I considered the contents of the claimant's originating application, the contents of the Notice of Appearance which has been entered in this case, a KPMG report dated 27 January 2005, and a copy of a letter dated 19 April 2006 (which Mr Martin had sent to the claimant). In the letter of 19 April, Mr Martin notified the claimant that he had instructions to apply for an order for costs against the claimant in certain circumstances. However, he has informed me, at this hearing, that no application for costs is being pursued. Chairman: Date and place of hearing: 5 July 2006, Belfast. Date decision recorded in register and issued to parties: BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/nie/cases/NIIT/2006/365_05.html