L v L (Rev 1) [2018] NIMaster 14 (19 October 2018)
The former matrimonial home should be transferred to the Petitioner, as this best serves the welfare of the children, particularly given B's autism and the children's established ties to their home, school, and community. The Respondent's business needs and family land interests are outweighed by the children's welfare and the Petitioner’s agreement to grant an easement to Respondent’s father.
- Citation
- [2018] NIMaster 14
- Parties
- Petitioner: L; Respondent: L
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 19 October 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Ancillary Relief (financial Provision) Following Divorce / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Former matrimonial home transferred to Petitioner; Respondent retains equity in other properties and business assets; clean break settlement; no order as to costs; extension of appeal time by 3 weeks.
- Legal Topics
- Ancillary Relief, Division of Matrimonial Assets, Welfare of Children, Clean Break Settlement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
L
Petitioner
L
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Ancillary Relief (financial Provision) Following Divorce / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the former matrimonial home should be transferred to the Petitioner or Respondent
- 2 Appropriate division of assets in light of children's welfare
Ratio Decidendi
The former matrimonial home should be transferred to the Petitioner, as this best serves the welfare of the children, particularly given B's autism and the children's established ties to their home, school, and community. The Respondent's business needs and family land interests are outweighed by the children's welfare and the Petitioner’s agreement to grant an easement to Respondent’s father.
Court Disposition
Former matrimonial home transferred to Petitioner; Respondent retains equity in other properties and business assets; clean break settlement; no order as to costs; extension of appeal time by 3 weeks.
Orders
- Petitioner to grant easement to Respondent’s father for access to fields through former matrimonial home gate.
- Respondent has first option to buy the house at market value if sold, provided offer is not less than £180,000.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment