M v L (Re Costs) [2026] NIMaster 4 (27 February 2026)
Although the wife achieved a better percentage outcome at the hearing, her failure to engage realistically in settlement negotiations and to respond to a reasonable Calderbank offer justifies a partial costs order against her. However, the order must not undermine the needs-based distribution or force the sale of the home, so only a fixed partial costs award is appropriate.
- Citation
- [2026] NIMaster 4
- Parties
- Petitioner: M; Respondent: L
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 27 February 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Ancillary Relief (family/matrimonial) / Post Judgment Costs Ruling
- Outcome
- Partial costs order in favour of the husband.
- Legal Topics
- Ancillary Relief, Costs Orders, Calderbank Offers, Clean Break, Needs Based Distribution
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M
Petitioner
L
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Ancillary Relief (family/matrimonial) / Post Judgment Costs Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the husband is entitled to a costs order in ancillary relief proceedings
- 2 Appropriate application of Calderbank principles in Northern Ireland family proceedings
- 3 Impact of costs order on needs-based distribution
Ratio Decidendi
Although the wife achieved a better percentage outcome at the hearing, her failure to engage realistically in settlement negotiations and to respond to a reasonable Calderbank offer justifies a partial costs order against her. However, the order must not undermine the needs-based distribution or force the sale of the home, so only a fixed partial costs award is appropriate.
Court Disposition
Partial costs order in favour of the husband.
Orders
- The wife is to pay the fixed sum of £3,000 plus VAT towards the husband's costs, to be paid to the husband's solicitors on or before 4 February 2027.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment