MA, R v [2012] NICC 33 (27 June 2012)

MA, R v [2012] NICC 33 (27 June 2012)

The defendant, as a primary carer, knew or ought to have known her child was in distress and required medical attention, and her failure to act and misleading of professionals constituted neglect warranting a custodial sentence and disqualification from working with children.

Citation
[2012] NICC 33
Parties
Prosecution: Regina; Defendant: MA; Co Accused: BC
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
27 June 2012
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing After Guilty Plea
Outcome
convicted and sentenced
Legal Topics
Child Neglect, Sentencing, Disqualification From Working With Children
Criminal Law Child Protection Child Neglect Sentencing Disqualification From Working With Children

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecution

MA

Defendant

BC

Co Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing After Guilty Plea

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant neglected her child by failing to seek medical attention and providing misleading information to professionals
  2. 2 Appropriate sentence for child neglect under the circumstances
  3. 3 Whether disqualification from working with children is mandatory

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant, as a primary carer, knew or ought to have known her child was in distress and required medical attention, and her failure to act and misleading of professionals constituted neglect warranting a custodial sentence and disqualification from working with children.

Court Disposition

convicted and sentenced

Orders

  • Two years imprisonment, six months to be served in custody, remainder on licence
  • Completion of anger management course