Fleming v Halus & Ors [2002] NIIT 174_98 (16 August 2002)
The applicant was subjected to sectarian harassment and was unlawfully discriminated against on grounds of his religious belief, particularly in the context of promotion procedures, due to lack of equal opportunities policy and training, and premature exclusion from consideration for promotion.
- Citation
- [2002] NIIT 174_98
- Parties
- Applicant: Malachy Fleming; Respondent: Kevin Halus; Respondent: Staff Sergeant Neely; Respondent: Ministry of Defence
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 16 August 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Fair Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Applicant's claims upheld
- Legal Topics
- Sectarian Harassment, Religious Discrimination, Promotion Procedures, Equal Opportunities Policy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Malachy Fleming
Applicant
Kevin Halus
Respondent
Staff Sergeant Neely
Respondent
Ministry of Defence
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Fair Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant was subjected to sectarian harassment
- 2 Whether the applicant was unlawfully discriminated against on grounds of religious belief
- 3 Whether the promotion procedure was unfair and discriminatory
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant was subjected to sectarian harassment and was unlawfully discriminated against on grounds of his religious belief, particularly in the context of promotion procedures, due to lack of equal opportunities policy and training, and premature exclusion from consideration for promotion.
Court Disposition
Applicant's claims upheld
Orders
- Declaration that the applicant was subjected to sectarian harassment
- Declaration that the applicant was unlawfully discriminated against on grounds of religious belief contrary to the Fair Employment and Treatment Order (Northern Ireland) 1998
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment