Field v Cunningham [2006] NIIT 318_06 (31 May 2006)

The claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy, the claim was submitted in time, and the agreed redundancy payment amount is due.

Citation: [2006] NIIT 318_06
Parties: Claimant: Roger William Field; Respondent: Marcus Cunningham
Jurisdiction: Northern Ireland
Judgment Date: 31 May 2006
Procedural Posture: Industrial Tribunal / Final Decision
Outcome: Claim allowed
Legal Topics: Redundancy, Redundancy Payment, Dismissal

Employment Law Redundancy Redundancy Payment Dismissal

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Sign in to unlock

Parties

Roger William Field

Claimant

Marcus Cunningham

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Industrial Tribunal / Final Decision

Legal Issues

1 Whether the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy
2 Whether the claimant is entitled to a redundancy payment and the amount due

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy, the claim was submitted in time, and the agreed redundancy payment amount is due.

Court Disposition

Claim allowed

Orders

Respondent to pay claimant £892.53 as redundancy payment