Kirkpatrick v Cunningham [2006] NIIT 521/06 (21 September 2006)
The claimant is entitled to compensation for redundancy pay and unpaid wages as the evidence supports her claims and the respondent did not contest.
- Citation
- [2006] NIIT 521/06
- Parties
- Claimant: Elizabeth Kirkpatrick; Respondent: Marcus Cunningham
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 21 September 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Industrial Tribunal / Remedy Hearing After Default Judgment
- Outcome
- Claimant awarded compensation for redundancy pay and unpaid wages.
- Legal Topics
- Redundancy Pay, Unpaid Wages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Parties
Elizabeth Kirkpatrick
Claimant
Marcus Cunningham
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal / Remedy Hearing After Default Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Entitlement to redundancy pay
- 2 Entitlement to unpaid wages
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant is entitled to compensation for redundancy pay and unpaid wages as the evidence supports her claims and the respondent did not contest.
Court Disposition
Claimant awarded compensation for redundancy pay and unpaid wages.
Orders
- Respondent to pay claimant £1,420.35 as redundancy payment.
- Respondent to pay claimant £111.51 as unpaid wages.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment