Kirkpatrick v Marcus Cunningham [2006] NIIT 522/06 (21 September 2006)

Kirkpatrick v Marcus Cunningham [2006] NIIT 522/06 (21 September 2006)

The claimant is entitled to compensation for redundancy pay and unpaid wages as the respondent failed to pay the statutory redundancy amount and wages for two weeks, and did not contest the claim.

Citation
[2006] NIIT 522/06
Parties
Claimant: Brian Adrian Kirkpatrick; Respondent: Marcus Cunningham
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
21 September 2006
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal / Remedy Decision Following Default Judgment
Outcome
Claimant awarded compensation for redundancy pay and unpaid wages.
Legal Topics
Redundancy Pay, Unpaid Wages, Default Judgment, Remedy Hearing
Employment Law Redundancy Pay Unpaid Wages Default Judgment Remedy Hearing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Brian Adrian Kirkpatrick

Claimant

Marcus Cunningham

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Industrial Tribunal / Remedy Decision Following Default Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Entitlement to redundancy pay
  2. 2 Entitlement to unpaid wages

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant is entitled to compensation for redundancy pay and unpaid wages as the respondent failed to pay the statutory redundancy amount and wages for two weeks, and did not contest the claim.

Court Disposition

Claimant awarded compensation for redundancy pay and unpaid wages.

Orders

  • Respondent to pay claimant £2,160.00 as redundancy payment.
  • Respondent to pay claimant £132.95 for unpaid wages for Week 38.