Devlin v JPH Law & Anor [2025] Nimaster 5 (28 February 2025)
The claim is at least arguable and not plainly or obviously statute barred on the face of the pleadings; the defendants have not overcome the high hurdle for strike out. Amendment of the defendant's name is allowed as a genuine mistake without prejudice.
- Citation
- [2025] Nimaster 5
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Mark Devlin; First Defendant: JPH Law (John P Hagan Solicitors); Second Defendant: Sean Hagan
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 28 February 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Professional Negligence / Interlocutory Application to Strike Out Claim
- Outcome
- Defendants' application to strike out refused; leave granted to amend title of proceedings.
- Legal Topics
- Limitation Period, Strike Out Applications, Amendment of Parties
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mark Devlin
Plaintiff
JPH Law (John P Hagan Solicitors)
First Defendant
Sean Hagan
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Professional Negligence / Interlocutory Application to Strike Out Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff's claim is statute barred under Article 12 of the Limitation (Northern Ireland) Order 1989
- 2 Whether the claim should be struck out under Order 18 rule 19 of the Rules of the Court of Judicature (Northern Ireland) 1980
- 3 Whether amendment of the title of proceedings is permissible
Ratio Decidendi
The claim is at least arguable and not plainly or obviously statute barred on the face of the pleadings; the defendants have not overcome the high hurdle for strike out. Amendment of the defendant's name is allowed as a genuine mistake without prejudice.
Court Disposition
Defendants' application to strike out refused; leave granted to amend title of proceedings.
Orders
- Plaintiff granted leave to amend title of proceedings to reflect John P Hagan Solicitors as first defendant.
- Defendants' strike out application refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment