Haddock v MGN Ltd & Ors [2008] NICh 14 (17 October 2008)
The plaintiff is entitled to be screened from the public during the hearing, except that he must be visible to the judge, court officials, legal advisors on both sides, and a very small number of persons chosen by the defendants, provided those persons have not served custodial sentences. This balances the plaintiff's right to life and fair trial with the interests of justice and the defendants' rights.
- Citation
- [2008] NICh 14
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Mark Haddock; Defendants: MGN Limited and Others (No. 1)
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 17 October 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Application for Screening Order
- Outcome
- Application granted with conditions
- Legal Topics
- Injunctions, Right to Life, Right to Fair Trial, Open Justice, Witness Protection, Privacy, Freedom of Expression
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mark Haddock
Plaintiff
MGN Limited and Others (No. 1)
Defendants
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application for Screening Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff should be screened from public view during the hearing to protect his safety
- 2 Whether the court should balance the plaintiff's rights against open justice and the interests of the defendants
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff is entitled to be screened from the public during the hearing, except that he must be visible to the judge, court officials, legal advisors on both sides, and a very small number of persons chosen by the defendants, provided those persons have not served custodial sentences. This balances the plaintiff's right to life and fair trial with the interests of justice and the defendants' rights.
Court Disposition
Application granted with conditions
Orders
- Plaintiff to be screened from public view during the hearing, except visible to judge, court officials, legal advisors, and a small number of persons chosen by the defendants who have not served custodial sentences.
- Assurance to be provided to the court regarding the custodial history of those permitted to view the plaintiff.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment