HJC v MCC (Valuation Hearing) [2018] NIMaster 12 (8 November 2018)
The court found that the jointly instructed expert, Mr Martin, was the most qualified and impartial valuer. The unilateral instruction of further experts by the Petitioner was not good practice and their reports lacked the necessary independence and detail. The court accepted Mr Martin's valuation, subject to a reduction for modernisation, setting the fair market value at £800,000.
- Parties
- Petitioner: HJC; Respondent: MCC
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 08 November 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Ancillary Relief / Family Law Valuation Hearing / Valuation Hearing Prior to Financial Dispute Resolution
- Outcome
- Valuation determined
- Legal Topics
- Ancillary Relief, Property Valuation, Expert Evidence, Financial Dispute Resolution
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
HJC
Petitioner
MCC
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Ancillary Relief / Family Law Valuation Hearing / Valuation Hearing Prior to Financial Dispute Resolution
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the fair market value of the former matrimonial home for the purposes of ancillary relief?
- 2 What weight should be given to the valuations provided by the respective experts?
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the jointly instructed expert, Mr Martin, was the most qualified and impartial valuer. The unilateral instruction of further experts by the Petitioner was not good practice and their reports lacked the necessary independence and detail. The court accepted Mr Martin's valuation, subject to a reduction for modernisation, setting the fair market value at £800,000.
Court Disposition
Valuation determined
Orders
- The fair market value of the former matrimonial home is set at £800,000 for the purposes of ancillary relief.
- Other ancillary relief issues, including the impact of the Petitioner's mother's occupation of the annex, to be addressed at the Financial Dispute Resolution hearing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment