Rogers v Meda Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd [2009] NIIT 388_09IT (16 October 2009)
Leave to amend the claim form is granted because the evidence required for the new claim is substantially the same as for the existing claims, and the application was made well in advance of the main hearing. Costs are refused as the main costs arose due to the respondent's opposition, and the claimant did not act...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2009] NIIT 388_09IT
- Parties
- Claimant: Eugene Rogers; Respondent: Meda Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 16 October 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Industrial Tribunal / Pre Hearing Review
- Outcome
- Leave to amend granted; application for costs refused.
- Legal Topics
- TUPE, Unfair Dismissal, Amendment of Claim, Costs
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Eugene Rogers
Claimant
Meda Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal / Pre Hearing Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant's claim form covers a TUPE-related unfair dismissal
- 2 Whether leave should be granted to amend the claim form to include a TUPE-related unfair dismissal
- 3 Whether costs should be awarded against the claimant for the amendment application
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to amend the claim form is granted because the evidence required for the new claim is substantially the same as for the existing claims, and the application was made well in advance of the main hearing. Costs are refused as the main costs arose due to the respondent's opposition, and the claimant did not act unreasonably.
Court Disposition
Leave to amend granted; application for costs refused.
Orders
- Claimant granted leave to amend claim form to include TUPE-related unfair dismissal.
- Respondent's application for costs refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment