Ulster Bank Ltd as Security Trustee for the Finance Parties v Taggart & Anor [2011] NIMaster 1 (3 March 2011)

Ulster Bank Ltd as Security Trustee for the Finance Parties v Taggart & Anor [2011] NIMaster 1 (3 March 2011)

The court found that the documentary evidence, contemporaneous correspondence, and the written terms of the guarantees did not support the respondents' claims that the guarantees were temporary or limited in scope. There was no credible evidence of representations or conduct by the bank to support estoppel,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2011] NIMaster 1
Parties
Petitioner: Ulster Bank Limited as Security Trustee for the Finance Parties; Respondent: Michael Adrian Taggart; Respondent: John Desmond Taggart
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
03 March 2011
Procedural Posture
Summary Judgment Application / Decision on Summary Judgment Under Order 14
Outcome
summary judgment granted for the applicant
Legal Topics
Personal Guarantees, Summary Judgment, Estoppel, Misrepresentation, Unilateral Mistake, Material Non Disclosure, Economic Duress, Legal Advice Waiver
Banking Law Contract Law Civil Procedure Personal Guarantees Summary Judgment Estoppel Misrepresentation Unilateral Mistake +3 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ulster Bank Limited as Security Trustee for the Finance Parties

Petitioner

Michael Adrian Taggart

Respondent

John Desmond Taggart

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Summary Judgment Application / Decision on Summary Judgment Under Order 14

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the personal guarantees executed by the respondents were only intended to be temporary or limited in scope
  2. 2 Whether the bank is estopped from enforcing the guarantees due to alleged representations or conduct
  3. 3 Whether there was misrepresentation or material non-disclosure by the bank regarding the scope of the guarantees

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the documentary evidence, contemporaneous correspondence, and the written terms of the guarantees did not support the respondents' claims that the guarantees were temporary or limited in scope. There was no credible evidence of representations or conduct by the bank to support estoppel, misrepresentation, or mistake. The respondents knowingly waived independent legal advice, and their personal circumstances did not vitiate consent. No real or bona fide defence was established, and summary judgment was appropriate.

Court Disposition

summary judgment granted for the applicant

Orders

  • Summary judgment for Ulster Bank Limited in respect of the £5,000,000 Guarantee (Writ No 2009/59937) against Michael Adrian Taggart and John Desmond Taggart.
  • Summary judgment for Ulster Bank Limited in respect of the €4,300,000 Guarantee (Writ No 2009/61625) against Michael Adrian Taggart and John Desmond Taggart.