Williamson, Re Judicial Review [2009] NIQB 63 (30 June 2009)
FM/DFM had legal authority to decline to appoint a single commissioner and to appoint four Commissioners Designate as preparatory measures pending legislative change; no evidence of unlawful discrimination or breach of public appointment guidelines; actions were lawful and within ministerial discretion.
- Citation
- [2009] NIQB 63
- Parties
- Applicant: Michelle Williamson; Respondents: First Minister and deputy First Minister
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 30 June 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Applications for judicial review dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Exercise of Prerogative Powers, Statutory Interpretation, Discrimination, Ministerial Discretion, Public Appointment Procedures
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michelle Williamson
Applicant
First Minister and deputy First Minister
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Did FM/DFM have statutory or legal authority to appoint four Commissioners Designate under the 2006 Order?
- 2 Were the decisions actuated by improper political considerations or discrimination in breach of Section 76 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998?
- 3 Did FM/DFM fail to comply with the requirement to appoint on merit in accordance with public appointment guidelines?
Ratio Decidendi
FM/DFM had legal authority to decline to appoint a single commissioner and to appoint four Commissioners Designate as preparatory measures pending legislative change; no evidence of unlawful discrimination or breach of public appointment guidelines; actions were lawful and within ministerial discretion.
Court Disposition
Applications for judicial review dismissed.
Orders
- No order of certiorari granted.
- No declarations granted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment