Skelton v Mitchelin Plc [2006] NIIT 252/06 (22 June 2006)

Skelton v Mitchelin Plc [2006] NIIT 252/06 (22 June 2006)

The claim was rejected solely due to an administrative oversight in omitting the date of birth, which was promptly corrected. In the interests of justice, the rejection was revoked and the claim accepted.

Citation
[2006] NIIT 252/06
Parties
Claimant: Tom Skelton; Respondent: Mitchelin Plc
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
22 June 2006
Procedural Posture
Review of Tribunal Decision / Review of Claim Rejection
Outcome
decision to reject the claim is revoked; claim accepted
Legal Topics
Tribunal Procedure, Claim Rejection, Administrative Oversight
Employment Law Tribunal Procedure Claim Rejection Administrative Oversight

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tom Skelton

Claimant

Mitchelin Plc

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Review of Tribunal Decision / Review of Claim Rejection

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the tribunal's decision to reject the claim for lack of prescribed information should be revoked

Ratio Decidendi

The claim was rejected solely due to an administrative oversight in omitting the date of birth, which was promptly corrected. In the interests of justice, the rejection was revoked and the claim accepted.

Court Disposition

decision to reject the claim is revoked; claim accepted

Orders

  • The claim is now accepted.