Hancock v MP Estates UKJanice Richardson [2015] NIIT 01030_15IT (31 July 2015)

Hancock v MP Estates UKJanice Richardson [2015] NIIT 01030_15IT (31 July 2015)

The claimant was employed by the second respondent, Janice Richardson, and is entitled to unpaid wages and notice pay as the claims are well-founded. The first respondent, MP Estates UK, is dismissed from the proceedings.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] NIIT 01030_15IT
Parties
Claimant: Mairead Hancock; Respondent: MP Estates UK; Respondent: Janice Richardson
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
31 July 2015
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal / Final Decision
Outcome
Claim partly upheld
Legal Topics
Wages Claim, Notice Pay, Employment Relationship
Employment Law Wages Claim Notice Pay Employment Relationship

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mairead Hancock

Claimant

MP Estates UK

Respondent

Janice Richardson

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Industrial Tribunal / Final Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was employed by the second respondent
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to unpaid wages
  3. 3 Whether the claimant is entitled to notice pay

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant was employed by the second respondent, Janice Richardson, and is entitled to unpaid wages and notice pay as the claims are well-founded. The first respondent, MP Estates UK, is dismissed from the proceedings.

Court Disposition

Claim partly upheld

Orders

  • Second respondent to pay claimant £1384.60 in respect of wages
  • Second respondent to pay claimant £300 in respect of notice pay