S v S [2009] NIFam 63 (31 January 2009)

S v S [2009] NIFam 63 (31 January 2009)

The court held that the agreed valuation was accurate at the time of settlement, the Respondent did not act expeditiously, and the collapse in property prices did not constitute grounds to set aside or vary the settlement. Leave to appeal out of time was not justified as the intervening event occurred too late and the appeal was not likely to succeed.

Citation
[2009] NIFam 63
Parties
Petitioner: Mrs S; Respondent: Mr S
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
31 January 2009
Procedural Posture
Ancillary Relief Proceedings / Post Settlement Applications and Challenge
Outcome
Respondent's applications to vary the lump sum, reduce the settlement, and extend time for appeal are dismissed.
Legal Topics
Variation of Lump Sum Order, Finality of Matrimonial Settlements, Effect of Unforeseen Events on Settlements
Family Law Variation of Lump Sum Order Finality of Matrimonial Settlements Effect of Unforeseen Events on Settlements

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mrs S

Petitioner

Mr S

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Ancillary Relief Proceedings / Post Settlement Applications and Challenge

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a lump sum order agreed in ancillary relief proceedings can be varied downwards due to a collapse in property prices
  2. 2 Whether leave to appeal out of time should be granted based on intervening events
  3. 3 Whether the settlement should be set aside due to unforeseen changes in asset value

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the agreed valuation was accurate at the time of settlement, the Respondent did not act expeditiously, and the collapse in property prices did not constitute grounds to set aside or vary the settlement. Leave to appeal out of time was not justified as the intervening event occurred too late and the appeal was not likely to succeed.

Court Disposition

Respondent's applications to vary the lump sum, reduce the settlement, and extend time for appeal are dismissed.

Orders

  • Matter adjourned for one month to deal with Petitioner's application for consequential directions.
  • Issue of time for appeal and costs to be considered at next hearing.