N v N [2009] NIMaster 64 (12 February 2009)
Given the duration of the marriage, equal contributions, the husband's financial conduct, and his inheritance of a property, a pension sharing order of 65% to the wife and 35% to the husband is warranted, with a clean break between the parties being appropriate and desirable.
- Citation
- [2009] NIMaster 64
- Parties
- Petitioner: N (the wife); Respondent: N (the husband)
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 12 February 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Ancillary Relief (family Law) / Final Hearing Before Master Bell, Following Non Attendance and Non Engagement by Respondent
- Outcome
- Pension sharing order granted: 65% to the wife, 35% to the husband; clean break ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Ancillary Relief, Pension Sharing Order, Division of Assets, Clean Break, Hearsay Evidence, Inherited Property
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
N (the wife)
Petitioner
N (the husband)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Ancillary Relief (family Law) / Final Hearing Before Master Bell, Following Non Attendance and Non Engagement by Respondent
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a pension sharing order should be made in favour of the wife and in what proportion
- 2 Whether the husband's inherited property should be considered in the division of assets
- 3 Whether the husband's financial conduct and non-engagement should affect the outcome
Ratio Decidendi
Given the duration of the marriage, equal contributions, the husband's financial conduct, and his inheritance of a property, a pension sharing order of 65% to the wife and 35% to the husband is warranted, with a clean break between the parties being appropriate and desirable.
Court Disposition
Pension sharing order granted: 65% to the wife, 35% to the husband; clean break ordered.
Orders
- Pension sharing order: 65% of husband's pension to wife, 35% to husband
- Clean break between parties
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment