Latimer, R v [2004] NICA 3 (09 February 2004)
The court held that, even with the fresh psychological evidence, Mrs A's identification of Latimer was reliable and not discredited, and the appellant's confessions were admissible and voluntary. The conviction was not rendered unsafe by the new evidence.
- Citation
- [2004] NICA 3
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Queen; Appellant: Neil Fraser Latimer
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 09 February 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Following Reference by Criminal Cases Review Commission
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Confession Evidence, Reliability of Witness, Fresh Evidence, Psychological Evidence, Judicial Discretion, Safety of Conviction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Queen
Prosecution
Neil Fraser Latimer
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Following Reference by Criminal Cases Review Commission
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conviction of Neil Fraser Latimer for murder is unsafe due to fresh psychological evidence regarding the reliability of a key witness and the appellant's confessions
- 2 Whether the appellant's confessions should have been excluded or regarded as unreliable due to his psychological profile and police conduct
- 3 Whether the evidence of Mrs A was reliable given her psychiatric history
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that, even with the fresh psychological evidence, Mrs A's identification of Latimer was reliable and not discredited, and the appellant's confessions were admissible and voluntary. The conviction was not rendered unsafe by the new evidence.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment