Latimer, R v [2004] NICA 3 (09 February 2004)

Latimer, R v [2004] NICA 3 (09 February 2004)

The court held that, even with the fresh psychological evidence, Mrs A's identification of Latimer was reliable and not discredited, and the appellant's confessions were admissible and voluntary. The conviction was not rendered unsafe by the new evidence.

Citation
[2004] NICA 3
Parties
Prosecution: The Queen; Appellant: Neil Fraser Latimer
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
09 February 2004
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Following Reference by Criminal Cases Review Commission
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Murder, Confession Evidence, Reliability of Witness, Fresh Evidence, Psychological Evidence, Judicial Discretion, Safety of Conviction

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Queen

Prosecution

Neil Fraser Latimer

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Following Reference by Criminal Cases Review Commission

  1. 1 Whether the conviction of Neil Fraser Latimer for murder is unsafe due to fresh psychological evidence regarding the reliability of a key witness and the appellant's confessions
  2. 2 Whether the appellant's confessions should have been excluded or regarded as unreliable due to his psychological profile and police conduct
  3. 3 Whether the evidence of Mrs A was reliable given her psychiatric history

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that, even with the fresh psychological evidence, Mrs A's identification of Latimer was reliable and not discredited, and the appellant's confessions were admissible and voluntary. The conviction was not rendered unsafe by the new evidence.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed