McCormick v Gallagher & Anor [2005] NIIT 9584_03 (28 June 2005)
The tribunal lacked jurisdiction to award further notice pay against the bankrupt first respondent; all sums due from the second respondent had been paid.
- Citation
- [2005] NIIT 9584_03
- Parties
- Claimant: Bronagh Nyree McCormick; First Respondent: Desmond T Gallagher (formerly t/a G K Architects); Second Respondent: Department for Employment & Learning
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 28 June 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Claim / Final Decision
- Outcome
- claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Notice Pay, Breach of Contract, Redundancy Pay, National Insurance Fund, Bankruptcy, Jurisdiction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Parties
Bronagh Nyree McCormick
Claimant
Desmond T Gallagher (formerly t/a G K Architects)
First Respondent
Department for Employment & Learning
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Claim / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was owed three further weeks' notice pay by the first respondent due to breach of contract
- 2 Whether any further sums were due to the claimant from the second respondent under Articles 227 and 229 of the Employment Rights (Northern Ireland) Order 1996
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal lacked jurisdiction to award further notice pay against the bankrupt first respondent; all sums due from the second respondent had been paid.
Court Disposition
claim dismissed
Orders
- No further sum payable by the second respondent to the claimant.
- Claim for breach of contract against the first respondent must be pursued in the High Court under insolvency law.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment