McLarnon, R v [2014] NICA 16 (21 February 2014)

McLarnon, R v [2014] NICA 16 (21 February 2014)

The Court held that the trial judge's assessment of dangerousness was properly considered and justified based on the applicant's history of violent offences, repeated breaches of court orders, psychological impact on the victim, and expert reports. The extended sentence imposed was appropriate and not manifestly...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] NICA 16
Parties
Prosecution: The Queen; Applicant: Patrick Francis McLarnon
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
21 February 2014
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal against sentence dismissed
Legal Topics
Dangerousness Assessment, Extended Sentences, Burglary With Intent, Harassment, Domestic Violence, Assessment of Risk, Criminal Justice (northern Ireland) Order 2008
Criminal Law Sentencing Dangerousness Assessment Extended Sentences Burglary With Intent Harassment Domestic Violence Assessment of Risk +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Queen

Prosecution

Patrick Francis McLarnon

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge erred in finding the applicant posed a significant risk of serious harm to the public under Article 15 of the Criminal Justice (Northern Ireland) Order 2008
  2. 2 Whether the extended sentence imposed was manifestly excessive or wrong in principle

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that the trial judge's assessment of dangerousness was properly considered and justified based on the applicant's history of violent offences, repeated breaches of court orders, psychological impact on the victim, and expert reports. The extended sentence imposed was appropriate and not manifestly excessive or wrong in principle.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal against sentence dismissed