McDaid, R v [2014] NICA 1 (8 January 2014)
The conviction was safe as the combination of facial mapping evidence, circumstantial evidence of participation and association, and the adverse inference from the appellant's silence provided sufficient proof of guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
- Citation
- [2014] NICA 1
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Queen; Appellant: Patrick McDaid
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 08 January 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed; conviction upheld
- Legal Topics
- Assisting Proscribed Organisation, Circumstantial Evidence, Adverse Inference, Facial Mapping Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Queen
Prosecution
Patrick McDaid
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conviction based on circumstantial and facial mapping evidence was safe
- 2 Whether the trial judge erred in refusing a no case submission
- 3 Whether adverse inference from silence was properly drawn
Ratio Decidendi
The conviction was safe as the combination of facial mapping evidence, circumstantial evidence of participation and association, and the adverse inference from the appellant's silence provided sufficient proof of guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed; conviction upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment