Guggenheim v Peter McCloskey Pater Oliver Hairdressing [2012] NIIT 02985_11IT (24 April 2012)

Guggenheim v Peter McCloskey Pater Oliver Hairdressing [2012] NIIT 02985_11IT (24 April 2012)

The claims were dismissed due to the claimant's failure to appear and lack of explanation for absence, after consideration of available information including the claim form.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2012] NIIT 02985_11IT
Parties
Claimant: Daniel Guggenheim; Respondent: Peter McCloskey; Respondent: Peter Oliver Hairdressing
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
24 April 2012
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal / Final Judgment
Outcome
Claims dismissed
Legal Topics
Unfair Dismissal, Disability Discrimination
Employment Law Discrimination Law Unfair Dismissal Disability Discrimination

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Daniel Guggenheim

Claimant

Peter McCloskey

Respondent

Peter Oliver Hairdressing

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Industrial Tribunal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed
  2. 2 Whether the claimant was subjected to disability discrimination

Ratio Decidendi

The claims were dismissed due to the claimant's failure to appear and lack of explanation for absence, after consideration of available information including the claim form.

Court Disposition

Claims dismissed

Orders

  • Claimant’s claims of unfair dismissal and disability discrimination are dismissed