McConnell v PINC Retail Ltd [2007] NIIT 1200_06 (8 June 2007)

McConnell v PINC Retail Ltd [2007] NIIT 1200_06 (8 June 2007)

The claimant is disabled within the meaning of the Act due to long-term epilepsy and has exactly one year's continuous service, qualifying her to bring an unfair dismissal claim.

Citation
[2007] NIIT 1200_06
Parties
Claimant: Karen McConnell; Respondent: PINC Retail Limited
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
08 June 2007
Procedural Posture
Pre Hearing Review / Determination of Preliminary Issues
Outcome
preliminary issues determined in favour of claimant
Legal Topics
Disability Status Under Disability Discrimination Act 1995, Continuous Employment for Unfair Dismissal

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Karen McConnell

Claimant

PINC Retail Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Pre Hearing Review / Determination of Preliminary Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant is a person with a disability under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995
  2. 2 Whether the claimant has one year's continuous service for unfair dismissal claim

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant is disabled within the meaning of the Act due to long-term epilepsy and has exactly one year's continuous service, qualifying her to bring an unfair dismissal claim.

Court Disposition

preliminary issues determined in favour of claimant

Orders

  • Claimant is declared a person with a disability under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995.
  • Claimant has one year's continuous service and may proceed with unfair dismissal claim.