RIce v Praxis Care Group [2013] NIIT 2242_12IT (15 August 2013)

RIce v Praxis Care Group [2013] NIIT 2242_12IT (15 August 2013)

The tribunal found that the revised contractual terms from 2010 lawfully classified the sleep-in period as unmeasured time, with a fixed sum of remuneration, and that the respondent was entitled to structure the contract in this way. The National Minimum Wage Regulations applied, and only time spent awake for the purpose of working during sleep-in periods counted as working time for minimum wage purposes. There was no breach of contract or unauthorised deduction from wages under Article 45 of the 1996 Order.

Citation
[2013] NIIT 2242_12IT
Parties
Claimant: Yvette Rice; Respondent: Praxis Care Group
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
15 August 2013
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal (employment) / Final Merits Hearing and Decision
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Unauthorised Deductions From Wages, National Minimum Wage, Contractual Terms of Employment, Sleep in Shifts, Unmeasured Time, Working Time Regulations
Employment Law Unauthorised Deductions From Wages National Minimum Wage Contractual Terms of Employment Sleep in Shifts Unmeasured Time Working Time Regulations

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Yvette Rice

Claimant

Praxis Care Group

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Industrial Tribunal (employment) / Final Merits Hearing and Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant suffered unauthorised deductions from wages under Article 45 of the Employment Rights (Northern Ireland) Order 1996
  2. 2 Whether the claimant was entitled to be paid the National Minimum Wage for sleep-in periods under her contract
  3. 3 Whether the revised contractual terms from 2010 lawfully classified sleep-in time as unmeasured time

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the revised contractual terms from 2010 lawfully classified the sleep-in period as unmeasured time, with a fixed sum of remuneration, and that the respondent was entitled to structure the contract in this way. The National Minimum Wage Regulations applied, and only time spent awake for the purpose of working during sleep-in periods counted as working time for minimum wage purposes. There was no breach of contract or unauthorised deduction from wages under Article 45 of the 1996 Order.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed