A P D v R D [2013] NIFam 7 (15 August 2013)
The respondent's minority shareholding in GHL should not be valued at a discount because there is no realistic prospect of him having to sell his shares on the open market; the valuation must reflect the reality that he will likely transfer the shares to his children or other shareholders at the Transfer Price as...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] NIFam 7
- Parties
- Petitioner: A P D; Respondent: R D
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 15 August 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Ancillary Relief (matrimonial Finance) / Preliminary Issue Determination
- Outcome
- Minority shareholding should not be valued at a discount.
- Legal Topics
- Valuation of Minority Shareholding, Ancillary Relief, Matrimonial Property Division, Shareholder Rights
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A P D
Petitioner
R D
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Ancillary Relief (matrimonial Finance) / Preliminary Issue Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Should the respondent's minority shareholding in GHL be valued at a discount for the purposes of matrimonial property division?
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent's minority shareholding in GHL should not be valued at a discount because there is no realistic prospect of him having to sell his shares on the open market; the valuation must reflect the reality that he will likely transfer the shares to his children or other shareholders at the Transfer Price as defined in the Articles of Association, which does not permit a discount for minority status.
Court Disposition
Minority shareholding should not be valued at a discount.
Orders
- The respondent's minority shareholding in GHL is to be valued without discount for minority status.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment