O'Hara v Red Sky Group Ltd [2009] NIIT 134_09IT (11 September 2009)
The claimant did not make protected disclosures within the statutory meaning prior to dismissal, did not act in good faith, and was dismissed for capability reasons, not for making protected disclosures. The evidence did not support the claim that the principal reason for dismissal was protected disclosure.
- Citation
- [2009] NIIT 134_09IT
- Parties
- Claimant: Ronan O'Hara; Respondent: Red Sky Group Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Industrial Tribunal Unfair Dismissal / Protected Disclosure / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Protected Disclosure, Whistleblowing, Capability Dismissal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ronan O'Hara
Claimant
Red Sky Group Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal Unfair Dismissal / Protected Disclosure / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant made protected disclosures within the meaning of the Public Interest Disclosure (Northern Ireland) Order 1998
- 2 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed for making protected disclosures
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant did not make protected disclosures within the statutory meaning prior to dismissal, did not act in good faith, and was dismissed for capability reasons, not for making protected disclosures. The evidence did not support the claim that the principal reason for dismissal was protected disclosure.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment