McKeag v Harry Boy and Judith McComiske... [2011] NIIT 01831_11IT (02 November 2011)

McKeag v Harry Boy and Judith McComiske... [2011] NIIT 01831_11IT (02 November 2011)

The claimant was dismissed due to business closure after 11 years of continuous service and is entitled to redundancy and notice pay as provided by law.

Citation
[2011] NIIT 01831_11IT
Parties
Claimant: Danielle Joanne McKeag; Respondents: Harry Boy and Judith McComiskey T/A Saks Hair & Beauty
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
02 November 2011
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Final Decision
Outcome
claim allowed
Legal Topics
Redundancy Payment, Notice Pay, Unfair Dismissal
Employment Law Redundancy Payment Notice Pay Unfair Dismissal

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Danielle Joanne McKeag

Claimant

Harry Boy and Judith McComiskey T/A Saks Hair & Beauty

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Entitlement to redundancy payment
  2. 2 Entitlement to notice pay

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant was dismissed due to business closure after 11 years of continuous service and is entitled to redundancy and notice pay as provided by law.

Court Disposition

claim allowed

Orders

  • Respondents to pay claimant £1,976.00 as redundancy payment
  • Respondents to pay claimant £1,878.47 as notice pay