McGreechan, R v [2014] NICA 5 (17 January 2014)
The Court of Appeal has no jurisdiction to hear an appeal against the Crown Court's order lifting reporting restrictions, as such an order is not a 'sentence' made on conviction within the meaning of the Criminal Appeal (NI) Act 1980. The exclusion of a right of appeal for the child in these circumstances violates Article 6 ECHR, and section 159(1)(c) of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 should be read to include a right of appeal against the discharge or refusal of reporting restrictions. However, if jurisdiction had existed, the balance of interests would have favoured open justice and publication of the appellant's identity.
- Citation
- [2014] NICA 5
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Queen; Appellant/defendant: Ryan McGreechan
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 17 January 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Lifting of Reporting Restrictions After Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction
- Legal Topics
- Reporting Restrictions, Juvenile Justice, Open Justice, Privacy Rights, Appeal Jurisdiction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Queen
Prosecution
Ryan McGreechan
Appellant/defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Lifting of Reporting Restrictions After Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court of Appeal has jurisdiction to hear an appeal against a Crown Court order lifting reporting restrictions on a child defendant after conviction
- 2 Whether the exclusion of a right of appeal for the child violates Article 6 ECHR (right to a fair trial/access to justice)
- 3 Whether the lifting of reporting restrictions was a proportionate interference with the child's Article 8 ECHR rights (privacy)
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal has no jurisdiction to hear an appeal against the Crown Court's order lifting reporting restrictions, as such an order is not a 'sentence' made on conviction within the meaning of the Criminal Appeal (NI) Act 1980. The exclusion of a right of appeal for the child in these circumstances violates Article 6 ECHR, and section 159(1)(c) of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 should be read to include a right of appeal against the discharge or refusal of reporting restrictions. However, if jurisdiction had existed, the balance of interests would have favoured open justice and publication of the appellant's identity.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction
Orders
- No order as to reporting restrictions; if jurisdiction had existed, the court would have refused to interfere with the Crown Court's decision to lift restrictions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment