Anderson v GM Retail Ltd (Breach of Contract Redundancy Payment Unfair Dismissal) [2021] NIIT 24503_19it (05 October 2021)

Anderson v GM Retail Ltd (Breach of Contract Redundancy Payment Unfair Dismissal) [2021] NIIT 24503_19it (05 October 2021)

The claimant is entitled to redundancy pay as the respondent failed to respond and the statutory criteria for redundancy pay are satisfied.

Citation
[2021] NIIT 24503
Parties
Claimant: Claimant; Respondent: Respondent
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
05 October 2021
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment Without Hearing
Outcome
claim allowed
Legal Topics
Redundancy Pay, Failure to Respond, Default Judgment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Claimant

Claimant

Respondent

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment Without Hearing

  1. 1 entitlement to redundancy pay
  2. 2 liability of respondent in absence of response

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant is entitled to redundancy pay as the respondent failed to respond and the statutory criteria for redundancy pay are satisfied.

Court Disposition

claim allowed

Orders

  • Respondent to pay claimant £2,714.05 as redundancy pay.