Stevens, R v [2002] NICA 33 (05 July 2002)

Stevens, R v [2002] NICA 33 (05 July 2002)

The absence of a specific Turnbull direction regarding identification from video and photographs did not render the conviction unsafe, as the comparison was straightforward and no special factors were present. The lack of a Turnbull direction regarding the witness's recognition from a photograph was not material, given its minor role in the trial. The judge's interventions did not exceed permissible limits or cause unfairness. No ground of appeal was made out.

Citation
[2002] NICA 33
Parties
Prosecution: The Queen; Applicant: Richard Kieran Stevens
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
05 July 2002
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Robbery, Identification Evidence, Judicial Directions, Appeal Procedure
Criminal Law Robbery Identification Evidence Judicial Directions Appeal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Queen

Prosecution

Richard Kieran Stevens

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge failed to give adequate Turnbull directions regarding identification evidence from video and photographs
  2. 2 Whether the judge failed to give a Turnbull direction regarding a witness's recognition of the applicant from a photograph
  3. 3 Whether the judge's interventions during trial rendered the trial unfair

Ratio Decidendi

The absence of a specific Turnbull direction regarding identification from video and photographs did not render the conviction unsafe, as the comparison was straightforward and no special factors were present. The lack of a Turnbull direction regarding the witness's recognition from a photograph was not material, given its minor role in the trial. The judge's interventions did not exceed permissible limits or cause unfairness. No ground of appeal was made out.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed