Hoy v Nash & Anor [2005] NIIT 2862_04 (13 April 2005)

Hoy v Nash & Anor [2005] NIIT 2862_04 (13 April 2005)

Tribunal accepted claimant's evidence that no pay was received for July and August, entitlement was £2,083.33 per month, and ordered payment of net sum after deductions.

Citation
[2005] NIIT 2862_04
Parties
Claimant: Alan James Hoy; Respondent: Richard Nash; Respondent: Sunrise Ltd
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
13 April 2005
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal / Final Decision
Outcome
Claim upheld against second respondent
Legal Topics
Unpaid Wages, Breach of Contract, Unlawful Deduction From Wages
Employment Law Unpaid Wages Breach of Contract Unlawful Deduction From Wages

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alan James Hoy

Claimant

Richard Nash

Respondent

Sunrise Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Industrial Tribunal / Final Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was unpaid for two months at the time of termination
  2. 2 Whether respondents breached contract for payment of wages
  3. 3 Whether there was any unlawful deduction from payments due

Ratio Decidendi

Tribunal accepted claimant's evidence that no pay was received for July and August, entitlement was £2,083.33 per month, and ordered payment of net sum after deductions.

Court Disposition

Claim upheld against second respondent

Orders

  • Second respondent to pay claimant £2,466.24 by way of unpaid wages