Belkovic v Toal [2016] NIQB 48 (20 May 2016)

Belkovic v Toal [2016] NIQB 48 (20 May 2016)

There is no legal obligation for the State to provide a court-funded interpreter in civil proceedings where the plaintiff can afford one; proceedings must be conducted in English; the plaintiff may engage his own interpreter but not his brother, who is unsuitable due to prior conduct; all court communications must be in English.

Citation
[2016] NIQB 48
Parties
Plaintiff/appellant: Marek Belkovic; Defendant/respondent: Dr Toal and BHSCT
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
20 May 2016
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court to High Court Regarding Procedural Applications
Outcome
appeal dismissed; applications refused; appeals stayed
Legal Topics
Right to Interpreter, Court Language Requirements, Mc Kenzie Friend, Access to Justice

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Marek Belkovic

Plaintiff/appellant

Dr Toal and BHSCT

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court to High Court Regarding Procedural Applications

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff should be provided with a court-funded interpreter in civil proceedings
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff can correspond with the court in Slovak
  3. 3 Whether the court should correspond with the plaintiff in Slovak

Ratio Decidendi

There is no legal obligation for the State to provide a court-funded interpreter in civil proceedings where the plaintiff can afford one; proceedings must be conducted in English; the plaintiff may engage his own interpreter but not his brother, who is unsuitable due to prior conduct; all court communications must be in English.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed; applications refused; appeals stayed

Orders

  • No court-funded interpreter for plaintiff; plaintiff may engage own interpreter (not his brother)
  • Plaintiff must correspond with court in English; court will correspond in English