Black, R v [2003] NICA 51 (05 December 2003)

Black, R v [2003] NICA 51 (05 December 2003)

The appellant was entitled to greater credit for his guilty plea, and absconding on bail should not have reduced that credit. The six-year sentence was outside the range for comparable cases; a three-year sentence was appropriate.

Citation
[2003] NICA 51
Parties
Prosecution: The Queen; Appellant: Robert Black
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
05 December 2003
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Credit for Guilty Plea, Burglary, Bail Absconding
Criminal Law Sentencing Credit for Guilty Plea Burglary Bail Absconding

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Queen

Prosecution

Robert Black

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether sufficient credit was given for guilty plea
  2. 2 Whether absconding on bail justified reduction in credit for guilty plea
  3. 3 Whether six-year sentence was manifestly excessive

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant was entitled to greater credit for his guilty plea, and absconding on bail should not have reduced that credit. The six-year sentence was outside the range for comparable cases; a three-year sentence was appropriate.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • Sentence on count 2 reduced to three years.
  • Consecutive three-month sentence for suspended sentence stands.