Graham v Robert Raymond Cunningham [2016] NIIT 00318_16IT (04 March 2016)

Graham v Robert Raymond Cunningham [2016] NIIT 00318_16IT (04 March 2016)

The claimant is entitled to a redundancy payment as he meets the statutory requirements regarding years of service, age, and redundancy multiplier.

Citation
[2016] NIIT 00318_16IT
Parties
Claimant: David Samuel Graham; Respondent: Robert Raymond Cunningham
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
04 March 2016
Procedural Posture
Redundancy Pay Claim / Final Decision
Outcome
claim allowed
Legal Topics
Redundancy Payment, Industrial Tribunal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David Samuel Graham

Claimant

Robert Raymond Cunningham

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Redundancy Pay Claim / Final Decision

  1. 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to a redundancy payment from the respondent

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant is entitled to a redundancy payment as he meets the statutory requirements regarding years of service, age, and redundancy multiplier.

Court Disposition

claim allowed

Orders

  • Respondent to pay claimant £4,538 as redundancy payment