Thompson v Roberta Gray and Gary Kane, t/... [2013] NIit 00578_13it (30 May 2013)

Thompson v Roberta Gray and Gary Kane, t/... [2013] NIit 00578_13it (30 May 2013)

The claimant's claims for redundancy pay, notice pay, and holiday pay are well-founded as the respondent failed to respond and the evidence supports the claims.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Claimant: Zoë Thompson; Respondent: Roberta Gray and Gary Kane, t/a Select Superstore
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
30 May 2013
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal / Decision on Merits, No Response From Respondent
Outcome
Claim allowed in full by default judgment
Legal Topics
Redundancy Pay, Notice Pay, Holiday Pay, Default Judgment
Employment Law Redundancy Pay Notice Pay Holiday Pay Default Judgment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Zoë Thompson

Claimant

Roberta Gray and Gary Kane, t/a Select Superstore

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Industrial Tribunal / Decision on Merits, No Response From Respondent

  1. 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to redundancy pay
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to notice pay
  3. 3 Whether the claimant is entitled to holiday pay for accrued but untaken holidays

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant's claims for redundancy pay, notice pay, and holiday pay are well-founded as the respondent failed to respond and the evidence supports the claims.

Court Disposition

Claim allowed in full by default judgment

Orders

  • Respondent to pay claimant £33.75 for redundancy pay
  • Respondent to pay claimant £67.50 for notice pay