Haslam v Rooster NI Ltd [2012] NIIT 00452_12IT (06 June 2012)

Haslam v Rooster NI Ltd [2012] NIIT 00452_12IT (06 June 2012)

It was not reasonably practicable for the claimant to present his claims within the three month time-limit due to being misled, and the claims were presented within a further reasonable period. The claimant is entitled to recover unauthorised deductions and sums owed due to breach of contract based on uncontradicted...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2012] NIIT 00452_12IT
Parties
Claimant: Stuart Haslam; Respondent: Rooster NI Ltd
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
06 June 2012
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal / Final Decision
Outcome
Claim allowed
Legal Topics
Breach of Contract, Unauthorised Deductions From Wages, Time Limits for Claims
Employment Law Breach of Contract Unauthorised Deductions From Wages Time Limits for Claims

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Stuart Haslam

Claimant

Rooster NI Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Industrial Tribunal / Final Decision

  1. 1 Whether the claim was presented within the statutory time limit
  2. 2 Whether unauthorised deductions from wages occurred
  3. 3 Whether sums are owed due to breach of contract

Ratio Decidendi

It was not reasonably practicable for the claimant to present his claims within the three month time-limit due to being misled, and the claims were presented within a further reasonable period. The claimant is entitled to recover unauthorised deductions and sums owed due to breach of contract based on uncontradicted evidence.

Court Disposition

Claim allowed

Orders

  • Respondent to pay claimant £1,000.43 for unauthorised deductions from wages
  • Respondent to pay claimant £3,020.81 for sums owing due to breach of contract