Holmes v Paul Mulholland [2012] NIIT 02258_12IT (18 December 2012)

Holmes v Paul Mulholland [2012] NIIT 02258_12IT (18 December 2012)

The claimant's redundancy pay claim is well-founded as the respondent failed to respond and is liable to pay the statutory redundancy amount.

Citation
[2012] NIIT 02258_12IT
Parties
Claimant: Rebecca McDowell; Respondent: Ross Stewart
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
18 December 2012
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal / Decision
Outcome
claim allowed in part
Legal Topics
Redundancy Pay, Notice Pay, Default Judgment
Employment Law Redundancy Pay Notice Pay Default Judgment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rebecca McDowell

Claimant

Ross Stewart

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Industrial Tribunal / Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to redundancy pay from the respondent
  2. 2 Whether leave to amend the claim form to include notice pay should be granted

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant's redundancy pay claim is well-founded as the respondent failed to respond and is liable to pay the statutory redundancy amount.

Court Disposition

claim allowed in part

Orders

  • Respondent to pay claimant redundancy payment of £2,136
  • Application for leave to amend claim form to include notice pay to be considered in due course