Tagro v Royal Mail Group Ltd [2012] NIIT 02183_10IT (24 February 2012)

Tagro v Royal Mail Group Ltd [2012] NIIT 02183_10IT (24 February 2012)

The claimant failed to establish any of the statutory grounds for review as there was no administrative error, no new evidence, and no argument falling under the interests of justice; mere disagreement with the tribunal's findings is not a ground for review.

Citation
[2012] NIIT 02183_10IT
Parties
Claimant: Serge Tagro; Respondent: Royal Mail Group Limited
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
24 February 2012
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal Review Application / Decision on Application for Review
Outcome
Application for review dismissed
Legal Topics
Disability Discrimination, Race Discrimination, Unfair Dismissal, Review of Tribunal Decision
Employment Law Discrimination Law Disability Discrimination Race Discrimination Unfair Dismissal Review of Tribunal Decision

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Serge Tagro

Claimant

Royal Mail Group Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Industrial Tribunal Review Application / Decision on Application for Review

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the tribunal's decision was wrongly made as a result of an administrative error
  2. 2 Whether new evidence has become available since the hearing which could not have been reasonably known or foreseen
  3. 3 Whether the interests of justice require a review of the tribunal's decision

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant failed to establish any of the statutory grounds for review as there was no administrative error, no new evidence, and no argument falling under the interests of justice; mere disagreement with the tribunal's findings is not a ground for review.

Court Disposition

Application for review dismissed