McGreevy v Royal Mail Group Plc [2006] NIIT 1168_06 (28 November 2006)

McGreevy v Royal Mail Group Plc [2006] NIIT 1168_06 (28 November 2006)

By signing for a 25 hour duty, the claimant agreed to a variation of his contract, reducing his contractual hours and pay accordingly; therefore, there was no unauthorised deduction of wages.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2006] NIIT 1168_06
Parties
Claimant: Scott James McGreevy; Respondent: Royal Mail Group Plc
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
28 November 2006
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal / Final Decision
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Unauthorised Deduction of Wages, Contractual Entitlement, Variation of Contract, Employment Rights
Employment Law Unauthorised Deduction of Wages Contractual Entitlement Variation of Contract Employment Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Scott James McGreevy

Claimant

Royal Mail Group Plc

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Industrial Tribunal / Final Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant suffered unauthorised deductions from wages
  2. 2 What was the claimant's contractual entitlement to pay during the relevant period

Ratio Decidendi

By signing for a 25 hour duty, the claimant agreed to a variation of his contract, reducing his contractual hours and pay accordingly; therefore, there was no unauthorised deduction of wages.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed