Hutchinson v Hutchinson (Redundancy Payment) [2018] NIIT 00002_18IT (12 April 2018)

Hutchinson v Hutchinson (Redundancy Payment) [2018] NIIT 00002_18IT (12 April 2018)

The claimant's redundancy pay claim against Russell Doherty is well-founded based on the statutory calculation of redundancy entitlement. The claim against Railway Meats Ltd is not well-founded and is dismissed.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] NIIT 00002_18IT
Parties
Claimant: George Andrew Hutchinson; Respondent: Russell Doherty; Respondent: Railway Meats Ltd
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
12 April 2018
Procedural Posture
Redundancy Payment Claim / Final Decision
Outcome
Claim against Russell Doherty allowed; claim against Railway Meats Ltd dismissed.
Legal Topics
Redundancy Payment, Employer Liability
Employment Law Redundancy Payment Employer Liability

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

George Andrew Hutchinson

Claimant

Russell Doherty

Respondent

Railway Meats Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Redundancy Payment Claim / Final Decision

  1. 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to a redundancy payment from the respondents
  2. 2 Whether Russell Doherty or Railway Meats Ltd is liable for the redundancy payment

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant's redundancy pay claim against Russell Doherty is well-founded based on the statutory calculation of redundancy entitlement. The claim against Railway Meats Ltd is not well-founded and is dismissed.

Court Disposition

Claim against Russell Doherty allowed; claim against Railway Meats Ltd dismissed.

Orders

  • Russell Doherty to pay redundancy payment of £5,495 to the claimant.
  • Claim against Railway Meats Ltd dismissed.