Wolf v Wolf (Unauthorised Deduction of Wages) [2018] NIIT 04263_17IT (20 February 2018)

Wolf v Wolf (Unauthorised Deduction of Wages) [2018] NIIT 04263_17IT (20 February 2018)

The claimant's case was dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-attendance and lack of communication with the tribunal.

Citation
[2018] NIIT 04263_17IT
Parties
Claimant: Fabian Ariel Wolf; Respondent: Ruth Chocron
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
20 February 2018
Procedural Posture
Unauthorised Deduction of Wages / Final Hearing
Outcome
case dismissed for want of prosecution
Legal Topics
Unauthorised Deduction of Wages, Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
Employment Law Unauthorised Deduction of Wages Dismissal for Want of Prosecution

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Fabian Ariel Wolf

Claimant

Ruth Chocron

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Unauthorised Deduction of Wages / Final Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was owed £380 by the respondent for work carried out
  2. 2 Whether the claimant was employed by the respondent

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant's case was dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-attendance and lack of communication with the tribunal.

Court Disposition

case dismissed for want of prosecution

Orders

  • proceedings dismissed in accordance with regulation 27(5) of the 2005 Regulations