Scott v Rymor Inns Ltd Danny Morton Steven Cowan [2013] NIIT 00661_12IT (17 January 2013)

Scott v Rymor Inns Ltd Danny Morton Steven Cowan [2013] NIIT 00661_12IT (17 January 2013)

The tribunal found that the claimant failed to substantiate her claims of constructive unfair dismissal, breach of contract, unauthorised deduction of wages, holiday pay, and unlawful discrimination. No allegations were made against the second respondent, and the claims against all respondents were dismissed.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] NIIT 00661_12IT
Parties
Claimant: Jennifer Scott; Respondent: Rymor Inns Ltd; Respondent: Danny Morton; Respondent: Steven Cowan
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
17 January 2013
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal / Final Hearing and Decision
Outcome
Claims dismissed
Legal Topics
Constructive Unfair Dismissal, Breach of Contract, Unauthorised Deduction of Wages, Holiday Pay, Unlawful Discrimination
Employment Law Constructive Unfair Dismissal Breach of Contract Unauthorised Deduction of Wages Holiday Pay Unlawful Discrimination

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jennifer Scott

Claimant

Rymor Inns Ltd

Respondent

Danny Morton

Respondent

Steven Cowan

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Industrial Tribunal / Final Hearing and Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was constructively unfairly dismissed
  2. 2 Whether there was a breach of contract
  3. 3 Whether there was an unauthorised deduction of wages

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant failed to substantiate her claims of constructive unfair dismissal, breach of contract, unauthorised deduction of wages, holiday pay, and unlawful discrimination. No allegations were made against the second respondent, and the claims against all respondents were dismissed.

Court Disposition

Claims dismissed

Orders

  • All claims against all respondents dismissed
  • Claim against second respondent struck out in its entirety