Gourley v Belfast Health & Social Care Trust & Anor [2024] NIMaster 15 (03 May 2024)

Plaintiff failed to comply with unless orders despite awareness and opportunity; no sufficient grounds for extension; interests of justice require upholding sanction and denying relief sought.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2024] NIMaster 15
Parties: Plaintiff: Samuel Gourley; First Defendant: Belfast Health & Social Care Trust; Second Defendant: University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
Jurisdiction: Northern Ireland
Judgment Date: 03 May 2024
Procedural Posture: Clinical Negligence / Application to Set Aside Judgment for Defendants Due to Failure to Serve Statement of Claim in Compliance With Unless Orders
Outcome: Application refused; judgment for defendants upheld.
Legal Topics: Unless Orders, Extension of Time, Judicial Discretion, Costs

Civil Procedure Medical Negligence Unless Orders Extension of Time Judicial Discretion Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 7 Authorities cited 18 Party arguments 2

Parties

Samuel Gourley

Plaintiff

Belfast Health & Social Care Trust

First Defendant

University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Clinical Negligence / Application to Set Aside Judgment for Defendants Due to Failure to Serve Statement of Claim in Compliance With Unless Orders

Legal Issues

1 Whether the plaintiff's failure to comply with unless orders justifies setting aside judgment for the defendants
2 Whether grounds exist for extending time for compliance with unless orders

Ratio Decidendi

Plaintiff failed to comply with unless orders despite awareness and opportunity; no sufficient grounds for extension; interests of justice require upholding sanction and denying relief sought.

Court Disposition

Application refused; judgment for defendants upheld.

Orders

Costs to defendants, to be taxed in default of agreement; enforcement stayed pending further order due to plaintiff's legal aid status.
Oral hearing on costs issue to be fixed.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.