McFarland v Morelli Ice Cream Limited Remo Di Vito (Discrimination - Sex) [2022] NIIT 05722_18IT (19 May 2022)

McFarland v Morelli Ice Cream Limited Remo Di Vito (Discrimination - Sex) [2022] NIIT 05722_18IT (19 May 2022)

The Tribunal approved the agreed redacted wording, finding that it removed the need for anonymity orders for any party except as to the unredacted original decision, and ordered the original anonymity order to be limited accordingly.

Citation
[2022] NIIT 05722_18IT
Parties
Claimant: Claimant; Respondent: Second Respondent
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
19 May 2022
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal Reconsideration / Application to Revoke Original Anonymity Order
Outcome
Original anonymity order revoked except as to unredacted original decision; redacted version approved.
Legal Topics
Anonymity Orders, Reconsideration of Judgments
Employment Law Procedural Law Anonymity Orders Reconsideration of Judgments

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Claimant

Claimant

Second Respondent

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal Reconsideration / Application to Revoke Original Anonymity Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the original anonymity order should be revoked in light of agreed redacted wording
  2. 2 Whether the interests of justice require reconsideration of the original decision

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal approved the agreed redacted wording, finding that it removed the need for anonymity orders for any party except as to the unredacted original decision, and ordered the original anonymity order to be limited accordingly.

Court Disposition

Original anonymity order revoked except as to unredacted original decision; redacted version approved.

Orders

  • The original anonymity order does not apply except insofar as it relates to the revised wording contained in the redacted decision.
  • The contents of the Tribunal’s unredacted original decision and the applicability of the anonymity order to those unredacted contents remain unaffected and unchanged, except for the approved redacted version.